Why Good Hitting Doesn’t Make a Great Player
Why Good Hitting Doesn’t Make a Great Player
The Manly Seaside Championships have arrived once again, spotlighting—perhaps more than ever—the young, athletic, and well-coached competitors. In the lead-up week, we’ve observed them grinding through their practice sessions, drilling relentlessly from the baseline, hammering forehands and backhands with familiar repetition.
But what’s been notably absent? Serves are scarce. Volleys, even rarer—treated almost like an unwelcome guest in their training routines.
What this reveals is a pattern: players focusing on what’s most comfortable and controllable (groundstrokes) while neglecting the parts of the game that require tactical creativity, improvisation, and emotional resilience—skills critical to thriving in real match scenarios.
Binary insight: Favoring repetition over tool box creates polished players who will underperform under pressure.
Why Being “Smart” Doesn’t Make You a Better Tennis Player
Despite widespread assumptions, higher intelligence doesn’t strongly predict happiness—or high performance under pressure. This paradox matters in tennis too.
Why? Because intelligence as traditionally measured focuses on solving well-defined problems—like equations or patterns. But tennis, like life, isn’t made of neatly packaged problems. It’s full of poorly defined ones: ambiguous, high-stakes, and emotionally charged.
Being “smart” in a technical sense doesn’t always help you navigate the shifting demands of a long match. To play well when it matters most, you need a different kind of intelligence—closer to wisdom than IQ.
Binary insight: Average players know the plan; wise players know how to adapt to the moment.
Intelligence vs. Match Wisdom
You can be brilliant at solving tactical problems—where to serve, how to exploit a weak second shot, how to construct a point.
But matches are rarely decided by clean logic alone.
They’re decided in ambiguous moments:
- Do you play safe or go big at 30–30?
- Can you reset after a double fault?
- Do you have the awareness to abandon a failing plan mid-match?
That’s not technical intelligence. That’s match wisdom.
And life works the same way.
You can be book smart—great at solving structured problems—but still falter when life throws you the ambiguous ones: Should you stay in this job? End this relationship? Take that risk?
These moments don’t come with answers. Just judgment.
Binary insight: Being technically smart doesn’t make you emotionally or tactically wise—in tennis or in life.
Well-Defined vs. Poorly Defined Problems
-
Well-defined: Hit 20 clean forehands into the backhand corner.
-
Poorly defined: Serve at 30–40 in a deciding set when your arm tightens, the crowd murmurs, and the last error is still echoing in your mind.
Practice deals in structure—clean repetitions, clear outcomes. But match play throws in doubt, emotion, and change. You don’t just need execution. You need judgment under uncertainty.
It’s the same in life. Well-defined problems look like exams, checklists, or clear career steps: Study hard, pass the test, get the job.
Poorly defined problems are emotional, messy, and situational: Navigating a breakup, choosing a life direction, dealing with illness, handling failure. There’s no playbook—only presence, flexibility, and self-awareness.
Binary insight: You can win practice and still lose the match. Life, like tennis, doesn’t always come with clear rules.
Cognitive Skills vs. Court Intelligence
Top players don’t just out-hit their opponents. They out-decide them.
True court intelligence goes beyond technique or tactics. It includes:
-
Emotional control when momentum shifts
-
Self-awareness to recognize what’s not working
-
Tactical adaptability under stress
It’s not about how much you know—it’s about how well you adjust when things fall apart.
And the same applies off the court. In life, too, success isn’t just about intellect or preparation. It’s about response. Do you cling to the plan that’s failing—or pivot? Do you panic—or pause and reset? Emotional agility often matters more than raw knowledge.
Binary insight: You can be brilliant on paper and still make poor real-life choices. Adaptability wins more than raw ability.
Data vs. Depth
In today’s data-rich, AI-driven tennis culture, it’s tempting to chase metrics:
-
First-serve percentage
-
Shot speed
-
RPMs
-
Court coverage stats
But performance isn’t just about optimization—it’s about response. The best players don’t play like spreadsheets. They manage pressure, adjust on the fly, and stay present in chaotic moments. That can’t be captured in numbers.
And it’s the same in life. We track steps, income, productivity, likes—believing more data will give us more control. But the most important decisions—how to handle heartbreak, when to change paths, what to stand for—can’t be measured. They require depth, not digits.
Binary insight: More data ≠ deeper understanding. More metrics ≠ better living.
The Whisperer Effect
Some of the most effective match players aren’t the strongest, fastest, or flashiest. They’re not always the most technically sound either.
But they compete with clarity.
They anticipate.
They adapt.
They find the win, even when their game isn’t firing or they are being overpowered when the balls are new.
They know where to stand. When to hold. When to go. Their advantage isn’t physical—it’s perceptual. It’s emotional. It’s intuitive.
You’ve seen this type off court, too. In life, it’s not always the most credentialed who handle pressure best. It’s the ones with feel. The ones who stay calm in tough conversations. The ones who navigate loss or conflict with presence, not panic.
Binary insight: It’s better to win ugly than to lose beautifully—in tennis and in life.
Wrap
Competitive tennis, like life, rewards wisdom over raw intelligence.
The best players aren’t always the smartest. They’re the ones who stay centered when things get messy—who don’t just react, but respond with clarity, adaptability, and purpose.
Too often, as in life, so-called intelligence lacks understanding. A clean forehand or sharp brain can only take you so far if you can’t handle ambiguity, pressure, or failure.
Life, like tennis, is a match full of bad bounces, sudden shifts, and unexpected tests. And just like on court, it’s not the most “talented” who thrive—but the one who knows how to hold their balance when it counts.
Don’t just practice to play well. Practice to choose well.
Read more –> The Art of Practice


