Pinpoint vs. Platform: Should You Switch Your Serve Stance?

I’ve noticed that both Alcaraz and Sinner have recently tweaked their serve motion, shifting from a platform stance to a pinpoint stance. What are the key advantages of this change, and should I consider making the switch in my own game?

Great observation — the shift from platform to pinpoint by players like Alcaraz and Sinner has sparked a lot of interest, and for good reason.

Why the Change Matters

The pinpoint stance, where the back foot slides up to meet the front foot during the service motion, creates greater upward momentum. This adjustment allows for a higher contact point, translating to:

• More power

• Improved serve angles

• Greater margin for error

For Sinner, this change has translated into more free points, aggressive positioning, and noticeable confidence when serving under pressure.

But Should Everyone Switch?

Not necessarily.

The platform stance, with feet shoulder-width apart throughout the motion, offers:

• Superior balance

• More consistent timing

• Less stress on joints

It’s a solid option for players who prioritize reliability, rhythm, and injury prevention.

So, Should You Make the Change?

Consider switching if:

• You’re physically strong and mobile enough to handle the increased load.

• You’re seeking more pop or higher trajectory on your serve.

• Your current stance feels limiting or inconsistent in match play.

Stick with platform if:

• Balance and repeatability are your strengths.

• You have any lower-body injuries or mobility concerns.

• Your serve is built more on placement and consistency than raw power.

Wrap

Ultimately, the best stance is the one that supports your game identity, physical condition, and long-term consistency.

For most advanced players, the goal isn’t just to hit aces — it’s to start the point with control. Whether that comes from pinpoint explosiveness or platform stability, your stance should serve the purpose of helping you dictate play from the very first shot.