How to Change a Stroke

/in , , /by

How to Change a Stroke

Changing a stroke is one of the toughest challenges in any precision sport. It’s not just about technique—it’s a complete shift in mechanics, mindset, and identity. The process is slow, frustrating, and often risky. Muscle memory resists, performance may dip, and the temptation to revert is strong. But when done right, the payoff can be game-changing.

Scottie Scheffler’s story is a blueprint. In 2023, the world No. 1 golfer couldn’t close tournaments despite being the best tee-to-green player on tour. His putting—once a fatal flaw—became a strength after he brought in Phil Kenyon, simplified his technique, switched to a mallet putter, and changed to a claw grip. By 2025, Scheffler was not just winning majors—he was dominating them.

Tennis has seen similar reinventions:

  • Roger Federer retooled his backhand in 2017 to counter Nadal’s topspin, leading to a career resurgence.

  • Rafael Nadal revamped his serve and return positioning under Carlos Moyá, extending his prime well into his 30s.

  • Carlos Alcaraz smoothed out his service motion before the 2025 season, improving pace and consistency.

  • Jannik Sinner adjusted his stance and preparation, unlocking more power and accuracy—key to his rise to world No. 1.

These stories all share the same process:

1. Diagnose the real issue — don’t guess or copy.
Use video and expert input to identify the actual flaw. Many players waste time changing what looks wrong rather than what affects outcomes.

2. Bring in expert help — adaptability and insight matter.
Work with coaches who tailor solutions to your game—not just general cookie-cutter mechanics. Their outside perspective helps you avoid chasing false fixes.

3. Simplify the change — focus on balance, timing, and feel.
Start with core fundamentals. Clean contact, balance, and fluid rhythm are the building blocks of every great stroke.

4. Modify equipment if needed — small tweaks, big returns.
A new racquet setup or grip adjustment can support better mechanics and feel. Like Scheffler’s switch to a mallet, or Federer moving to a 110 racket, equipment should match your new motion.

5. Rebuild identity and belief — use rituals and reinforcement.
You’re not just changing form—you’re changing how you see yourself. Use routines, cues, and positive self-talk to reinforce confidence in your new game.

6. Train under pressure — test it when it matters most.
Practice is just the beginning. To own the change, simulate match stress and play through it. That’s where new patterns get forged into reliable habits.

Wrap

Changing a stroke isn’t for the faint of heart. It demands clarity, commitment, and patience. But as Scheffler, Federer, and Sinner have shown, the reward isn’t just improvement—it’s transformation. Diagnose wisely. Train deliberately. Trust the process. That’s how players evolve—and how you can too.

De Minaur’s Serving Challenges

/in , , /by

De Minaur’s Serving Challenges

Alex de Minaur stands out on the ATP Tour for his blistering speed, defensive mastery, and strategic intelligence. Nicknamed “The Demon,” he’s known for chasing down balls others wouldn’t dream of reaching.

Yet even with this elite movement and mental toughness, one area remains a consistent shortfall: his serve.

Serve Improvements: Progress & Persistent Limitations

De Minaur has visibly worked on adding power to his serve, aiming for a more muscular delivery. However, at the Australian Open, and again in his loss to Alexander Bublik at the French Open, his serve revealed inefficiencies in one crucial aspect: rhythm.

A lack of rhythmic fluidity compromises:

  • Weight transfer from legs to core

  • Energy flow needed for power and consistency

Despite added muscle, his serve lacks kinetic efficiency, reducing both speed and accuracy under pressure.

Interestingly, his serve struggles mirror those of his mentor, Lleyton Hewitt—another world-class returner and competitor whose own serve was often considered the weakest part of his otherwise elite game.

Key Technical & Tactical Observations

1. Core Weight Transfer

A powerful serve begins from the ground up. Legs and hips load the energy, which flows through a stable core before releasing through the arm in a whip-like motion.

  • Issue: De Minaur’s core often disengages mid-motion, breaking this energy chain.

  • Result: Reduced velocity and inconsistent placement.

2. Rhythm and Timing

The best servers look smooth and unhurried—like a choreographed dance.

  • Issue: De Minaur appears to “muscle” his serve, introducing rigidity.

  • Result: Loss of natural flow and difficulty adjusting under pressure.

3. Second Serve Vulnerability

Without a reliable first serve, his second serve becomes exposed.

  • Issue: Poor rhythm and rushed mechanics limit spin and kick.

  • Result: Returners can step in and attack, shifting momentum.

Specific Mechanical Breakdowns

  • Hand Break Timing: De Minaur’s hands separate too early, disrupting timing and diminishing the serve’s coil-and-release potential.

  • Ball Toss and Balance: Starting his motion with the racquet below knee level undermines balance, leading to inconsistent tosses and poor contact points.

Performance Takeaway

De Minaur’s serve isn’t just a physical problem—it’s a coordination and balance issue. This was starkly evident in his loss to Bublik at Roland Garros, where the same serving flaws were on full display. Without reliable rhythm, energy fails to flow effectively through his kinetic chain. As a counter-punching baseliner, improving serve rhythm could unlock the next level in his game.

Pinpoint vs Platform Serve

/in , , /by

Pinpoint vs. Platform: Should You Switch Your Serve Stance?

I’ve noticed that both Alcaraz and Sinner have recently tweaked their serve motion, shifting from a platform stance to a pinpoint stance. What are the key advantages of this change, and should I consider making the switch in my own game?

Why the Change Matters

Great observation — the shift from platform to pinpoint by players like Alcaraz and Sinner has sparked a lot of interest, and for good reason.
The pinpoint stance, where the back foot slides up to meet the front foot during the service motion, creates greater upward momentum. This adjustment allows for a higher contact point, translating to:
  • More power
  • Improved serve angles
  • Greater margin for error
For Sinner, in particular, this change has translated to more free points, aggressive positioning, and noticeable confidence when serving under pressure.

But Should Everyone Switch?

Not necessarily.
The platform stance, with feet shoulder-width apart throughout the motion, offers:
  • Superior balance
  • More consistent timing
  • Less stress on joints
It’s a solid option for players who prioritize reliability, rhythm, and injury prevention.

So, Should You Make the Change?

Consider switching if:

  • You’re physically strong and mobile enough to handle the increased load.
  • You’re seeking more pop or higher trajectory on your serve.
  • Your current stance feels limiting or inconsistent in match play.

Stick with platform if:

  • Balance and repeatability are your strengths.
  • You have any lower-body injuries or mobility concerns.
  • Your serve is built more on placement and consistency than raw power.

Wrap-Up

Ultimately, the best stance is the one that supports your game identity, physical condition, and long-term consistency.
For most advanced players, the goal isn’t just to hit aces — it’s to start the point with control. Whether that comes from pinpoint explosiveness or platform stability, your stance should serve the purpose of helping you dictate play from the very first shot.

Stability or Power? Choosing the Right Serve Stance

/in , , /by

Pinpoint vs. Platform: Should You Switch Your Serve Stance?

I’ve noticed that both Alcaraz and Sinner have recently tweaked their serve motion, shifting from a platform stance to a pinpoint stance. What are the key advantages of this change, and should I consider making the switch in my own game?

Great observation — the shift from platform to pinpoint by players like Alcaraz and Sinner has sparked a lot of interest, and for good reason.

Why the Change Matters

The pinpoint stance, where the back foot slides up to meet the front foot during the service motion, creates greater upward momentum. This adjustment allows for a higher contact point, translating to:

  • More power

  • Improved serve angles

  • Greater margin for error

For Sinner, this change has translated into more free points, aggressive positioning, and noticeable confidence when serving under pressure.

But Should Everyone Switch?

Not necessarily.

The platform stance, with feet shoulder-width apart throughout the motion, offers:

  • Superior balance

  • More consistent timing

  • Less stress on joints

It’s a solid option for players who prioritize reliability, rhythm, and injury prevention.

So, Should You Make the Change?

Consider switching if:

  • You’re physically strong and mobile enough to handle the increased load.

  • You’re seeking more pop or higher trajectory on your serve.

  • Your current stance feels limiting or inconsistent in match play.

Stick with platform if:

  • Balance and repeatability are your strengths.

  • You have any lower-body injuries or mobility concerns.

  • Your serve is built more on placement and consistency than raw power.

Wrap

Ultimately, the best stance is the one that supports your game identity, physical condition, and long-term consistency.

For most advanced players, the goal isn’t just to hit aces — it’s to start the point with control. Whether that comes from pinpoint explosiveness or platform stability, your stance should serve the purpose of helping you dictate play from the very first shot.

How the Slice Serve Helps Aging or Injured Shoulders

/in , , /by

Why the Slice Serve Becomes Your Best Friend as You Age

As the years add up—or after decades of competitive play—our bodies start to speak up.
The shoulders, in particular, often bear the brunt of wear and tear.

That classic high-toss, overhead serve? It can begin to feel more like a liability than a weapon.

But here’s the good news: you don’t have to give up on serving effectively.
The slice serve offers a smart, efficient, and body-friendly alternative that delivers results—even as mobility declines.

Why the Slice Serve Works for Aging Players or Shoulder Limitations

The slice serve is a long-term ally.
It reduces physical strain by minimizing the need for full shoulder elevation and using a lower toss. Instead of driving upward, it shifts the workload to torso rotation and edge control.

Rather than attacking the ball from above, you glide across the outside, producing sidespin that curves wide or jams your opponent.

The result?
A serve that’s easier on your joints—and tougher for your opponent to read and return.

The Basics of the Slice Serve

To make the slice serve a go-to weapon, dial in these fundamentals:

  • Use a continental grip

  • Toss the ball slightly to your dominant side and just in front

  • Lead the swing with the racket edge around the 3 o’clock position

  • Brush across the ball from right to left (for right-handers)

  • Let your follow-through wrap across your body naturally

This lateral motion not only reduces shoulder stress, but it also creates a low, skidding bounce that’s particularly effective:

  • Out wide on the deuce side

  • Into the body on the ad side

Smart, Surgical Tennis That Ages Well

The slice serve isn’t just about physical relief—it’s a tactical upgrade.

It sets up first-strike opportunities, disrupts rhythm, and gives you control—without needing raw power or extensive shoulder mobility.

This is the heart of high-percentage tennis:
Precision over power. Efficiency over strain.

As your game evolves, the slice serve helps you stay sharp, strategic, and sustainable—for many more matches to come.